新足迹

标题: 35年老house已经卖掉了，折旧报告还需要做吗？ [打印本页]

作者: freshair 时间: 2015-8-31 10:44
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: xyouc 时间: 2015-8-31 10:54
感觉你是要做估价报告而不是折旧报告。
你这个情况估计只能按年平均算增值（想要证明1年4个月没有增值的报告不是事后做的，应该当年做估值，卖的时候再估值）

作者: 1212qwe 时间: 2015-8-31 11:39

作者: LENNY_DONG 时间: 2015-8-31 11:52
别折腾了。对你来说没有意义的

作者: freshair 时间: 2015-8-31 11:55
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: LENNY_DONG 时间: 2015-8-31 12:16

freshair 发表于 2015-8-31 11:55 [url=http:/oursteps.co/[url=http:/oursteps.co/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=23395973&ptid=1106159" target="_blank">
愿闻其详

没有什么

你都卖了。做了没意义

折旧是每年出租房子是抵扣的

你现在做折旧，难道你打算修改以前每年报税

35年房子折旧也没多少。费钱不省税

作者: freshair 时间: 2015-8-31 13:15
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: flame0515 时间: 2015-8-31 14:40
可以参考ATO网站了解一下自住房转投资房后仍将其视为自住房的六年法则：

https://www.ato.gov.au/General/C ... after-you-move-out/

If you use the dwelling to produce income (for example, you rent it out or it is available for rent) you can choose to treat it as your main residence for up to six years after you cease living in it. If, as a result of you making this choice, the dwelling is fully exempt, the home first used to produce income rule does not apply.

作者: freshair 时间: 2015-9-2 16:41
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: juvenMPG 时间: 2015-9-2 17:19

flame0515 发表于 2015-8-31 14:40 [url=http:/oursteps.co/[url=http:/oursteps.co/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=23398218&ptid=1106159" target="_blank">
可以参考ATO网站了解一下自住房转投资房后仍将其视为自住房的六年法则：

https://www.ato.gov.au/General/ ...

楼主这个在卖之前已经有了新的自住房，这个六年法则应该不适用了吧

作者: flame0515 时间: 2015-9-2 18:15

juvenMPG 发表于 2015-9-2 17:19 [url=http:/oursteps.co/[url=http:/oursteps.co/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=23423756&ptid=1106159" target="_blank">
楼主这个在卖之前已经有了新的自住房，这个六年法则应该不适用了吧

ATO 那个link上有好几个不同的具体例子请具体参考特别是这个例子，在这个例子中IAN拥有三套房产，如果我从网站上的理解没错的话，
无论你有多少套房产，在这个六年里你选择其中一个（只能一个）当作自住房是可以得，即使你同一时间还拥有其他房产。

Example

Home ceases to be the main residence and is used to produce income for more than six years during a single period of absence

“As Ian did not claim the main residence exemption for either of his Brisbane or Melbourne homes he is able to choose to treat the Sydney home as his main residence for the period after he stopped living in it. Ian claims the exemption for this property.”

When you can make this choice

This choice needs to be made only for the income year that the CGT event happens to the dwelling – for example, the year that you enter into a contract to sell it.

If you own both:
•the dwelling that you can choose to treat as your main residence after you no longer live in it
•the dwelling you actually lived in during that period

you make the choice for the income year you enter into the contract to sell the first of those dwellings.

If you make this choice, you cannot treat any other dwelling as your main residence for that period (except for a limited time if you are changing main residences).

作者: juvenMPG 时间: 2015-9-2 22:00

flame0515 发表于 2015-9-2 18:15 [url=http:/oursteps.co/[url=http:/oursteps.co/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=23424288&ptid=1106159" target="_blank">
ATO 那个link上有好几个不同的具体例子请具体参考特别是这个例子，在这个例子中IAN拥有三套房产，如果 ...

对啊，但是貌似lz已经选择了新买的房作为自住房，而且住了一年多了

欢迎光临新足迹 (https://oursteps.co/bbs/forum.php/[size=4][size=14px][url=http:/oursteps.co/[size=4][size=14px][url=http:/oursteps.co/)